Sour Grapes

Sour Grapes

Of course we're Fair and Balanced!

Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by Blogger, SDF, my employer or my family, but they should be.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Blog home
Blog archives
(don't know where they've
gone since Aug 2006)
Web home
Contact
Legend Consulting
Justin's blog
(not updated since Nov 2006)

Results of 2 Nov 2004 General Election (winners in bold; click on office for more detail)

PA State House of Representatives—152nd District
- Ross Schriftman (D)
- Sue Cornell (R-incumbent)
State Attorney General
- Jim Eisenhower (D)
- Marakay Rogers (Green)
- John Ewbank (Libertarian)
- Tom Corbett (R)
State Auditor
- Jack Wagner (D)
- Ben Price (Green)
- Berlie Etzel (Libertarian)
- Joe Peters (R)
State Treasurer
- Max Lampenfeld (Constitution)
- Robert Casey (D)
- Paul Teese (Green)
- Darryl Perry (Libertarian)
- J. Craige Pepper (R)
US House of Representatives—13th District
US Senate
President

Tools

since 12 Apr 2004

Where in the world are visitors to this page located?
(Month-to-date totals since 15 July 2007)

2004-08-31

DOJ censors Supreme Court

After reading this posting at The Memory Hole [via blogdex]I've never been happier to be a card-carrying member of the ACLU. And I don't understand why so many people don't understand why John Ashcroft terrifies some of us.

Ostensibly, they [the Department of Justice (DOJ)] would use their powers of censorship only to remove material that truly could jeopardize US operations. But in reality, what did they do? They blacked out a quotation from a Supreme Court decision:

"The danger to political dissent is acute where the Government attempts to act under so vague a concept as the power to protect 'domestic security.' Given the difficulty of defining the domestic security interest, the danger of abuse in acting to protect that interest becomes apparent."

The mind reels at such a blatant abuse of power (and at the sheer chutzpah of using national security as an excuse to censor a quotation about using national security as an excuse to stifle dissent).

Original post by Hugh at 8/31/2004 12:56:00 PM Eastern time :: 0 comment(s) :: links to this post

0 comment(s):

Links to this post:

<\$BlogBacklinkControl\$> <\$BlogBacklinkTitle\$> <\$BlogBacklinkDeleteIcon\$>: <\$BlogBacklinkSnippet\$>
posted by <\$BlogBacklinkAuthor\$> \@ <\$BlogBacklinkDateTime\$>

Blog home
Blog archives

Justice (Civil Liberties, so-called Intellectual Property, Privacy & Secrecy); Politics & Government (International, National, State, Local); Humor (Irony & the Funny or Unusual); Science & Technology (Astronomy, Computers, the Internet, e-Voting, Crypto, Physics & Space); Communication (Books, Film, Media, Music & the English Language); Economics (Corporatism & Consumerism); and Items of Purely Personal Note (including Genealogy, Photography, Religion & Spirituality).